[The
following paper was written for presentation at the
AAAHRP Black History Conference in Seattle, Washington,
February 2006. {
www.aaahrp.org } “Cipher” is an introduction to
Arthur Graham’s next major work in progress, and it
points to the dilemma of fake literary ancestors and how
to combat hoaxes with original and convincing
scholarship.]
“ … Ah been a
delegate to de big ’ssociation of life.
Yessuh! De Grand
Lodge, de big convention of livin’
is just where Ah
been dis year and a half y’all
ain’t seen me.”
Zora Neale Hurston, Eyes (p. 6)
This is
a grand tour of all things seen and unseen, “de big
convention,” the mystical association of ideas leading
to the inventions of African American literary
ancestors—Jupiter Hammon, Phillis Wheatley, George Moses
Horton, Samuel Eli Cornish, John Russwurm, Footah Jallo
and David Walker.
This is
about self-negation and self-revelation, sympathy and
generation, spirit and water—Sankofa and Oshun and Mary, too. It stands to transcend the
yoke of “mystical theology” and the myth of white
supremacy. This is a “living” struggle and Death’s-Head
shall not prevail! Welcome to Maat—the judgment
scene.
The
initial “letters” of omni ciphers mentioned just
now, from Jupiter Hammon to David Walker, constitute and
convey the encryption of “jhpwgmhsecjrfjdw.”
This
presentation offers the most plausible and conclusive
explanations of the mystery of what we may call, omni
ciphers. Ironically, these omni ciphers are
both part of the problem and part of the solution
because by unraveling their significations we come to
the fountainhead of the Grand Tour Lie of white
supremacy while removing the veil from justice.
Let us cast our eyes toward the judgment.
HISTORY
For the
past year and a half, I’ve been wrapped up, so to speak,
in a quilt of omni ciphers, that of my own imagination
and that of others, such as “The Jefferson Wheel
Cipher,” reportedly used as a military tool; and the
“Atbash Cipher,” a Hebrew code reportedly employed by
scribes in the time of Jeremiah, an epoch wherein a
certain manuscript was found in the tabernacle, hitherto
unknown to everyone living except the finder. So here I
am seeker and finder, in the uncanny position of
rendering some “proof” to my claim.
A big
book, similar to The Manichean Leitmotif, on this
topic of omni ciphers is in the making. Subliminal
Racism (2005) led directly to this presentation.
These works then give substance to the task at hand and
place our undertaking on a profound and sublime path.
OMNI CIPHERS
Notwithstanding Albert Murray’s contention in his book, The Omni Americans (1970), that his “conception
makes Americans identify with all their
ancestors,” we must first determine the veracity and
authenticity of our ancestors—especially our received
heritage in the form of “African American Literary
Ancestors.”
In an
afterword to Hurston’s Eyes, Henry Louis Gates
sees in Murray’s “Social Science Fiction Monster” a
devouring “beast,” a “received heritage” that conveys
… the idea that racism had
reduced black people to mere ciphers,
to beings who only react to an
omnipresent racial oppression, whose
culture is “deprived” where
different, and whose psyches are in the
main “pathological.” (p. 199)
In Subliminal Racism (2005), Graham celebrates Holly
Jackson’s article, “Mistaken Identity,” appearing in The Boston Globe, February 20, 2005. Jackson
discovered that the novel, Four Girls at Cottage City
(1895), was written by a “white” ancestor once
thought to be “black,” “high yellow,” or “mulatto,” Emma
Dunham Kelly-Hawkins. Jackson surmised that Hawkins is
a “complete historical cipher.”
Conversely, doubt became the “examiner,” and Holly
Jackson found not “hope” in Hawkins’ white drawn
characters but “reflections of white racial anxiety.”
(p. 78 SRE)
Jackson’s discovery marks a significant departure in our
willingness to accept—carte blank—certain celebrated
ancestors without corroborating data on their
authenticity.
JAYSON-BLAIR CIRCUS: THE GRAND TOUR LIE
Presently, we shall unravel the unifying signification
underlying the metaphor, “omni ciphers,” by a
brief examination of the mythic, aesthetic, historic,
and ideologically-forged events and persons that
comprise the identity formation of the “other.”
Our
approach is based upon Graham’s notion of “Mystical
Theology and Identity Formation,” a section taken from Subliminal Racism (66-67). In general, Graham
proclaims that
Race-based mystical theology
leads to identity formation of
Negro ciphers in history and
literature, and may be envisioned
through four divisions of
perception and manifestation. (p.66)
1.) Prophets: The first among those chosen is Phillis
Wheatley. Here is the “Divine Cipher”—drawn
first from “Phillis and Brunetta,” a “witty”
story appearing in The Spectator, June 1,
1711; and second—after 1801 and 1977—from the Grand Tour
Alignment of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune, the gloriously predicted, highly hailed, Blue Planet.
Within
the parameter of these earthly and astrological
co-ordinances, conveyances, and conjunctions, then,
Phillis becomes the fountainhead of Negating Mystical
Theology—the once “fetish” pagan illuminated into a
single cause.
When
properly questioned, Phillis “speaks Light” as an
agent of Christian Conversion. She is now seen
as a by-product of a “mythomanical” epoch, as well as of
“individuals” such as Governor Thomas Hutchinson
(1711-1780) and Reverend Mather Byles (1707-1788)—two of
her “1772 craft examiners” with an intrepid
passion for lying.
Phenomenally, her case or “trial” closed and has entered
the dust bin of pseudo-historical events. In The
Historian’s Craft (1953), Marc Bloch records
similar related phenomena: (p. 156)
There were the pseudo-Celtic
poems attributed to Ossian,
the epic poems and ballads
written in what Chatterton believed
was Old English, the allegedly
medieval poetry of Clothilde of
Surville, the Breton songs
devised by Villemarqué, songs said
to have been translated from
Croatian by Mérimée, the heroic
Czech songs from the manuscript
of Kravoli-Dvor, and others
too numerous to mention. During
these decades, it was as if
a vast symphony of deception
resounded from one end of
Europe to the other. (p. 94)
2.) Poetry: The First Negro Syndrome among those
elevated to “literary ancestors” is the “I god”
Jupiter Hammon, an embodiment of the planet Jupiter. In
the pantheon of omni ciphers, he emerges as both father
and son of the “Divine Wheatley.”
All
works and timely publications attributed to him are
predicated upon association of ideas, individuals,
historic events, place names and landmarks. Hammon’s
chief chore is the veneration of Phillis Wheatley by the
invention of “self” as the white man’s obedient and
faithful “other.”
3.) History: Acrostican George Moses Horton, in tertium quid, becomes the spoken “Light-Word” of
Wisdom Palms 119. First and foremost, Horton fits well
into this historical division that constitutes organized
“activities of thought” [i.e., racist culture] within
repositories for cultural, political and economic
dominance or self-preservation. Chief among these
repositories is the University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill, a Catch 22 institution that gave birth to
Big George and has sustained his existence down to this
day.
Functionally, as the perennial “Professional Spouter”
along the Grand Tour Lie for all times, his coded
voice echoes the white masters’ “Double-Speak,”
disguised propaganda. “Orators” Samuel Eli Cornish,
John Russwurm, the “Prince” from Footah Jallo, and their
devised machinery of deception, Freedom’s Journal, fit into this division, also, as historical pawns.
4.) Law: Edmund Burke’s dictates of the “rule of law”
and “entailed inheritance” inform the Master-Slave Rule
of Law that is embedded in the “identity formation” of
Leviathan Cipher David Walker—the sign and symbol of
Absolute Evil.
Subliminal Racism declares that Walker’s Appeal is the masterpiece of anti-insurrection
propaganda stemming from covert and subversive
activities and from secret societies—the chief
forerunners being a pack of ex-Confederate generals that
later transmuted into the KKK.
Theoretically, how these ciphers were constructed and
brought to “paper” is further demonstrated in Subliminal Racism. For now, by way of introduction,
we need to consider them in terms of absolute pairs:
Good/Evil. White/Black. Divine/Pagan. Master/Slave.
Real/Imaginary—or doublespeak.
All in
all, these omni ciphers enter the convention of
the association of ideas within the Grand Lodge or Grand
Tour Lie. That is, they are perceived, invented,
mythologized, and deliberately juxtaposed to real
historic figures and key events to render the impression
that they did in fact “exist” among all notable
ancestors, black and white alike.
RUDE BEGINNINGS AND AFTER ADVANCES
Further close investigation of the
received sources and origins of African American
original literature stands to expose the forgeries of
facts and events encasing these omni ciphers.
The key
to this new approach and paradigmatic reframing of our
rude beginnings and after advances as “literate” folks
must be re-established by vigorous analysis and
interpretation of the entire canvas of historic events
and real people—not omnipresent ciphers imposed on us
for psycho-social control.
This
amounts to a profound paradigm shift that began in 1972
with Graham’s Manichean Leitmotif, and with his
recently published Subliminal Racism Essays.
Perhaps
our innocence and naivety will abate with an awareness
of Unitarian Minister Samuel Gilman (1791-1858) and his
influential theory of original literature based on his
concept of “felt relation” to the exclusion of slaves
and pagans.
In
documents uncovered by Graham, Gilman contends that
slavery must exist in America as it did in Athens, a
society that was “neither the freest nor the quietest of
Grecian republics.” What is more, liberty, which
is a certain “freedom founded on law,” is the result of
“military glory,” which, ultimately, is the source of
letters that follows.
Historically, according to Samuel Gilmam, in the course
of all literature, then, from its “rude beginnings” to
its “after advances,” nothing was “necessary, as to
freedom, except the absence of such utter control, as
extinguishes all will or thought, except its own.” (69)
Today,
the big question still looms over us: Can slaves
originate a literature based upon conquered defeat and
not “military glory,” forged events, and psychological
warfare along the white supremacist, Grand Tour Lie—to
keep the nigger running?
In the
names of all ancestors, ourselves, and our
children’s children, let us enter the historical process
of regaining a language, history, and literature based
on genuine “freedom” of our own makings and not one
predicated on mystical theology designed to confuse and
deceive us. According to Graham,
Phillis
Wheatley never left the company and care of the Boston
examiners
who gave her as inheritance to modern day racists who
play on the
subliminal mind through mystical theology, to baffle
black
females into submission to a white God, and to contain
and
relegate
vainglorious and presumptive Black males—begging
perpetually
and blindly, by way of fake “literary ancestors,”
for “human”
and “civil rights.” (SRE, p. 98)
Please,
join Holly Jackson, Arthur Graham, and a growing number
of “us” doubting examiners, by casting aside these omni
ciphers set before us all as sign and symbol of Death’s-Head. Like a psychologically fragmented
serpent in the grass, we must be made wise of subliminal racism and skin color symbolism at
the deepest levels.
Most
important, we must join in this struggle to end the
jinks of all jinks—forged literary ancestors. Two
prominent “public” dunces of this brand of tricknology
are
Louis Farrakhan and his Willie Lynch Letter
(1712), and
Henry Louis Gates, Jr. and his $8,500-“incog-negro”
Bondwoman’s Narrative (1850).